crime+scene

media type="custom" key="4743233"My name is Detective Briana. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene at 2:13 at a 3 bedroom 1 bathroom apartment, The alleged victim was Felix Navidad he is not very well liked, he is rich and left money for his parents. The suspect guilty of committing this crime is Kendra. This suspect's guilt was confirmed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene.

The most incriminating piece of evidence was the fingerprints found on Felix's cup. The evidence was found on his cup at 2:45 and he was laying on the floor. The test performed was a base and his cup got poisoned (Fingerprint test?!?) .The results of the test were 2 and 3 for the pH# (I thought this was the fingerprint test?). This connects the suspect to the crime because if her fingerprints were on felix's cup and the ph# was 2 and 3 his cup got poisoned by Kendra.

The next piece of evidence collected was Kendra writing a note. It was found on a cardboard piece of paper, Kendra tried to make it hard to see so she would not get caught guilty.The test performed was her handwriting, but she signed it as Vera.The results of the test were Kendra wrote it saying Dear Martha, I'm glad it's over, Felix is dead, I will be back soon, Love Vera. This connects the suspect to the crime because she wrote it acting like Vera to hide something.

Another piece of evidence collected was Felix's cup was base. It was found when he was having coke with Alfredo. The test performed was a base. The results of the test were his cup got poisoned. This connects the suspect to the crime because Felix is dead because of Kendra. (How do you know cola is not normally a base?)

The last piece of evidence collected was Kendra had powder on her shoe. It was found on her shoe.The test performed was the powder on her shoe turned black. The results of the test were stating that she did something with the powder that made it end up on her shoe.This connects the suspect to the crime because she was connected to felix's cup.

According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. My evidence leads to Kendra doing something to Felix, and hiding information. (This is the step-by-step account of how Kendra committed the crime.) Therefore, Kendra committed the crime of killing Felix for his money. **Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || **__Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds.__** || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  || Slow down the reading speed just a bit || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast. || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast. ||^  || 72% ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || **__Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.__**  || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.  || __** The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.  **__ || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  || Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  || **__Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.__**  || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. || **__ The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene. __** || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  || Conclusion summarizes information.  || **__ Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information  __** || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.__**  || Rehearsed, smooth delivery.  || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening. || **__Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.__**
 * ^  || **__Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.__**  || Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.  || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.__**  || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.  __** || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__ Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.  __** || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.__**  || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.__**  || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.  __** || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 41/57